AREAS OF PRACTICE

TORT LITIGATION

Heyl Royster has been recognized for many years as the "go to" defense firm in Downstate Illinois for virtually every type of tort litigation. With over 100 attorneys in five locations, Heyl Royster lawyers have successfully defended clients in all of the federal courts and in each of the 102 counties in the State of Illinois, as well as in contiguous states. Our clients come from all sectors of the business community – Fortune 500 companies, small business concerns, insurance carriers, professionals, and individuals – and the tort-related cases in which we represent them cover a broad spectrum of disciplines, including:

These cases often involve wrongful death, catastrophic injury and other high-exposure claims brought against businesses or individuals. In serious transportation and construction accidents, for example, our attorneys are frequently retained within hours of the accident, and are trained to immediately go to the accident scene, meet with the client and its employees and commence the investigation utilizing highly-qualified experts to take photographs, make necessary measurements and reconstruct the accident in order to assist the client in estimating potential exposure at the earliest possible time.

We take pride in being the largest law firm in Illinois that is not based in Chicago. While Heyl Royster is frequently retained to handle complex and high-exposure cases in Cook County, our on-the-ground knowledge and experience with "Downstate Illinois" (i.e., outside of Cook County) judges, lawyers, jury venires, jury verdicts, and the customs and practices in downstate venues is often advantageous for our clients in the evaluation and defense of tort cases of all types and magnitudes.

Heyl Royster possesses the litigation resources and expertise that allows us to provide our clients with the same services and responsiveness that would be expected at a large metropolitan firm but at the costs associated with a downstate firm, i.e., we can provide our clients with the same level of service but at less expense than our metropolitan competitors. With at least five partners in each of our five offices, we can provide appropriate levels of staffing, depth and agility at cost-effective rates. By leveraging technology, we frequently utilize multi-office staffing to provide our clients with the requisite expertise regardless of where a particular case is venued.

Our firm is unique in that we have expanded in response to client demand by sending our people to locations to open offices. The managing partners in each of our five offices began their legal careers in the Peoria office, and a number of other senior attorneys in each office began their legal careers in Peoria or one of the other offices. We do not operate our offices as separate profit centers, but rather encourage our lawyers to share work when doing so will benefit the client. Team concepts are stressed not only within the firm but also in the representation of our clients. We believe that the client is best served when everyone on the team – the partner, the claims professional and/or corporate counsel, the associate and the paralegal – is contributing information and ideas and has a role to play. We very much like to work with committed professionals whose input and ideas are solicited and utilized to add perspective and value to the handling of a matter. Our lawyers pride themselves on being client-centric, recognizing that cases in which our firm has been retained are the client's cases, not ours, and thus our focus is on achieving the client's goals.

Heyl Royster is committed to bringing disputes to conclusion as quickly and reasonably as possible. Our focus is on early evaluation of both liability and damage issues, and then assisting the client to formulate a strategy and budget designed to achieve an optimal result. Although trial skills are obviously emphasized in our firm – most of our partners who are trial lawyers have been recognized by their peers as reflected in various lawyer-rating services (e.g., Martindale-Hubbell, Leading Lawyers, Super Lawyers, and so on) – it has never been our intention to run every dispute through the judicial system. Our goal is to help clients achieve the most favorable resolution possible in a prompt, cost-effective fashion without prolonged, uncontrolled and expensive litigation. For example, in many instances our use of aggressive motion practice has led to the transfer of a case to a more favorable defense forum, or to a favorable settlement (because of the possibility of an adverse ruling), or to an outright dismissal. In others, when consistent with the objectives of our client, we have used various ADR tools (e.g., voluntary and court-ordered mediation, arbitration, summary jury trials, court settlement conferences/pre-trials, etc.) at our disposal. We often utilize structured settlements, mutual tolling (of statutes of limitations) agreements, high-low agreements, and other creative approaches to resolve difficult cases. While we know that not every case will go to trial – and that in many cases, early settlement may be the most cost-effective result for our client – we also realize that in many instances a client cannot obtain a favorable resolution unless the opponents realize that the threat of trial is real and they will be up against a firm of first-class trial lawyers.

Through our lawyers' participation in bar and industry activities, we not only identify, but help develop trends in the law which we believe will be of benefit to our clients and the defense bar. Many of our partners either hold or have held leadership positions in local, state and national bar and defense organizations. In recent years, partners in our firm have headed the International Association of Defense Counsel (IADC), the Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel (FDCC); and Lawyers for Civil Justice (LCJ). We have had several partners on the Board of Directors of DRI, and other partners have been chairs of DRI Substantive Law Committees. Three of our partners have been president of the Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel, and many others have been active in that organization in one capacity or another. One of our partners was a president of the Illinois State Bar Association and recently served on the American Bar Association Board of Governors. A number of our partners have been involved in either drafting or passing tort reform legislation, and our firm is very much committed to taking a leadership role to "level the playing field" for our clients and advancing our system of jurisprudence. Collectively, the lawyers in our firm spend hundreds of volunteer hours each year as part of our commitment to improving the civil justice system.

Significant Cases

  • Osborne v. Joseph O’Brien and O’Brien Steel Service, Inc. Successfully defended (no-liability verdict) action brought by permanently disabled plaintiff injured when defendant's vehicle slid on ice and crossed center line in one-week jury trial.  
  • Greenlee v. First National Bank in Dekalb 175 Ill. App. 3d 236 (2d Dist. 1988) Second District Appellate Court holding that national building code provisions (BOCA) adopted by DeKalb County do not apply to a 100 year old farm house.
  • Lower v. Rucker 217 Ill. App. 3d 1 (2d Dist. 1991) Reversal of trial court's order to produce statement of witness/passenger, who was also an insured under the same policy as the driver. The case, which involved a car/pedestrian collision at high speeds, was later tried before a jury and resulted in a defense verdict. (Jury Trial, 1994, Ogle County)
  • B & J Sales, Inc. v. Peterbilt Arbitration, McLean County, IL, Case no. 03 AR 77. Subrogation claim seeking recovery from truck maintenance provider.
  • Obtained summary judgment for a design engineer in construction injury claims in the construction of a nuclear power facility.
  • Successfully defended national trucking firm and driver in catastrophic injury claim when client driver struck the rear of a parked tractor-trailer unit by demonstrating through accident reconstruction testimony that the semi was parked in the travel portion of the interstate.
  • Obtained summary judgment for a design engineering firm in multiple wrongful death claims arising out of an accident during the repair of a bridge over the Illinois River.
  • Successfully defended nationwide trucking firm in accident in which the defendant truck driver and the two plaintiff truck drivers were all killed in the same accident by utilization of accident reconstruction to demonstrate that the plaintiff's version of how the accident occurred could not have physically happened.
  • Successfully removed to federal court a wrongful death claim against an international resort chain for a claim brought in state court when a decedent was killed following a palm tree falling on him at resort in Caribbean. Also successfully argued that Dutch law should apply resulting in a significantly less value to the case.
  • Bubb v. Springfield School Dist. 186 167 Ill. 2d 372 (1995) In a case of first impression, the court interpreted language in Section 3-106 of the Tort Immunity Act, finding that statutory recreational immunity is triggered by the recreational character of the property regardless of its primary purpose.
  • Lane v. Troxtell and Rockwell Trial; minimal jury verdict in favor plaintiff-passenger on the back of a motorcycle that was struck by insured-driver's pick-up.
  • Moore v. Swoboda 213 Ill. App. 3d 217 (4th Dist. 1991); appeal denied, 141 Ill. 2d. 544 (1991) Trial and appeal; wrongful death jury verdict in favor of parents of deceased minor reversed on appeal due to parents' own contributory fault in allowing 14 year old minor to drive dirt bike unsupervised in rural areas. The Wrongful Death Act was amended shortly thereafter to eliminate the possibility of a beneficiary's contributory fault as a complete bar to any recovery.
  • Massengale v. K-Mart Corporation Trial; not guilty jury verdict for alleged slip and fall on spilled motor oil.
  • O’Byrne v. Morlock Trial; minimal jury verdict for plaintiff in two car accident with 93 year old insured-driver.
  • Patton v. Prospect Foods, Inc. Trial; minimal jury award for plaintiff who was allegedly assaulted by grocery store employees after claimed theft of store items.
  • Bohlen v. Shaw and Tate Trial; multiple car accident resulting in assessment of 10% fault against our insured-driver.
  • Lytle v. Burgland, et al. Obtained favorable settlement (structured settlement with cost in low six figures) in case where plaintiff partially paralyzed after automobile accident. 
  • Berry v. American Standard, Inc. 382 Ill. App. 3d 895 (5th Dist. 2008) Denial of use of deceased plaintiff's discovery deposition as admissible evidence to defeat defendant's summary judgment motion.
  • Thurman v. Hamm’s Holiday Harbor 2005 Peoria County, wrongful death trial.
  • Waterman v. Swisher 2002 Warren County, trial concerning loss of an eye.
  • Fearnow and Colvin v. Steidinger 1997 Livingston County, multi-party death trial.
  • Moore v. Diamond-Star Motors 1993 McLean County, multi-party trial.
  • West v. Kirkham 207 Ill. App. 3d 954 (4th Dist. 1991) Recognized that trial court may find plaintiff contributorily negligent as a matter of law.
  • Harris v. Walker 119 Ill. 2d 542 (1988) The Illinois Supreme Court held that a person who rents a horse and thereafter sustains injuries while horseback riding cannot obtain a recovery from the riding stable for a claimed violation of the Animal Control Act, as a renter of a horse is not within the class of persons the legislature intended to protect when it enacted the Animal Control Act. In addition, an exculpatory release signed by the Plaintiff is enforceable to release the riding stable from negligence liability.
  • Watson v. J.C. Penney Co., Inc. 237 Ill. App. 3d 976 (4th Dist. 1992) The court refuses to overrule the natural accumulation rule which was applied to preclude the plaintiff from obtaining a recovery for a slip and fall on a natural accumulation of ice.
  • Page v. Blank 262 Ill. App. 3d 580 (4th Dist. 1994) Discusses what duty a landowner owes to protect the safety of children, and concludes that a landowner owes no duty and is not liable to a 12 year old who suffers a loss of vision in an eye, when the child struck a nail with a hammer and the nail bounced into his eye while building a skate board ramp on the defendant's premises.
  • Bubb v. Springfield School Dist. 186 167 Ill. 2d 372 (1995) This was a case of first impression. The Illinois Supreme Court held that the recreational immunity set forth in Section 3-106 of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act applies to preclude liability if the property upon which the plaintiff sustains an injury was intended or permitted to be used for recreational purposes, regardless of the specific use of the property at the time of injury or the primary purpose of the property.
  • Rocke v. Froelich McLean County, 2007 Premises liability trial.
  • Zimmerman v. Fasco Mills Co. 302 Ill. App. 3d 308 (2d Dist. 1998) Dismissal of case involving "fireman's rule."
  • Baker v. Boomgarden 263 Ill. App. 3d 251 (2d Dist. 1994) Dismissal of roofers' personal injury claim against homeowners. 
  • Donovan v. Beloit Corp. 275 Ill. App. 3d 25 (2d Dist. 1995) Structural Work Act versus pre-emption of OSHA issue.
  • John Doe, et al. v. Catholic Diocese of Peoria 2008 Trial court dismissed ten clergy sex abuse lawsuits with prejudice based on statute of repose grounds.
  • John Doe, et al. v. Catholic Diocese of Peoria 2008 Trial court dismissed sex abuse lawsuits with prejudice based on statute of limitations 
  • West v. Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod Trial court granted summary judgment on First Amendment grounds to minister and religious entities in defamation action, presently on appeal in Third District Appellate Court.
  • Bush v. Catholic Diocese of Peoria (3d Dist. 2007) Affirmed trial court's dismissal of removed priest's breach of contract claim under First Amendment. Also affirmed dismissal of count for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
  • Zarr v. Kroger Co. 218 Ill. 2d 559 (2006) Affirmed summary judgment in wrongful death premises liability case.
  • Hamm v. Schnorr 321 Ill. App. 3d 1067 (4th Dist. 2001) Affirmed summary judgment where plaintiff on motorcycle was injured by defendant's cattle.
  • Bush v. Catholic Diocese of Peoria 351 Ill. App. 3d 558 (3d Dist. 2004) Protective Order was appropriate in clergy defamation/sex abuse lawsuit. 
  • Williams v. Old English Inn Jury Trial, McLean County, IL. Plaintiff was a patron in defendant's tavern when another patron leaned or pulled on a shelf supporting a 19-inch television set and other items, causing them to fall, striking plaintiff on the head and shoulder. Plaintiff, a 27-year-old district sales rep, suffered cervical and head injuries, loss of consciousness, numbness, tingling, and reduced function of left arm and hand from thoracic outlet syndrome. Asked jury for $471,000+. Result: Not guilty.
  • Kohl v. Miller Personal Injury, Peoria County. Defendant and his son were operating a hayrack ride for plaintiff's group. Three members of the group were thrown from the wagon. Plaintiff claimed the defendant was negligent for driving too fast and not breaking up bales of hay. Plaintiff suffered back and neck injuries, claiming numbness in the left arm and fingers requiring him to retire early from his job as an inventory computer operator. The 64-year-old plaintiff claimed lost wages of $138,000 and incurred $13,000 in medical specials. Result: Not guilty.
  • Reising v. Fowler Personal Injury, Tazewell County. Interesting Contribution Result. A 5-year-old boy riding his bicycle was struck by a passing motorist as he entered the road from our client's driveway. Plaintiff claimed our client was negligent for improperly parking his antique fire truck along the roadside in a manner which obstructed vision to drivers. After summary judgment was denied to our client, a contribution claim was brought against the child's father who gave the boy permission to ride his bicycle in the street. The boy sustained facial injuries, including scarring, a bulbous deformity requiring two scar revisions and loss of two teeth. The driver settled prior to trial. We were not allowed to put the driver's settlement in evidence nor litigate his percent of negligence. Result: Our client was found negligent, but 66% was passed on to the boy's father for failing to properly supervise. With the setoff from the driver's settlement, our client paid nothing. 
  • State Farm v. Daniels Successfully defended (no-liability verdict) tractor-trailer operator in jury trial alleging negligence in interstate collision.
  • Anderson v. Rooney Sangamon County, 2009-L-092 Plaintiff claimed she was injured as a result of the defendant's vehicle striking hers from behind. After having been taken by ambulance from the scene of the accident, plaintiff sought treatment from a variety of health care providers, including extensive chiropractic treatment, for soft-tissue type injuries. After an eight minute deliberation, the jury returned a defense verdict. Plaintiff's last settlement demand before trial was $45,000.
  • Ginger v. Alan Collebrusco and Alan Collebrusco Construction, Inc. - Christian County, 06 L 08 (2010) - Plaintiff claimed injuries after a motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff Allen Ginger underwent cervical surgery and received extensive care of treatment for injuries he claimed were exclusively related to the accident. On behalf of the defendant, it was argued that the majority of plaintiff's complaints were not related to the accident, but rather pre-existing conditions. At trial, plaintiff introduced medical bills of $79,500. Plaintiff's initial settlement demand was $2,500,000. On the eve of trial the demand was reduced to $500,000. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $65,000, with $0 allocated to pain and suffering and $0 allocated to loss of normal life.
  • Goodknight v. Village of Royal 197 Ill. App. 3d 319 (1990) Common law liability of a municipality for injuries sustained due to consumption of alcohol.
  • Buell v. Oakland Fire Protection District 237 Ill. App. 3d 940 (1992) Applicability of Tort Immunity Act in contribution claim against an ambulance service.
  • Fillpot v. Midway Airlines 261 Ill. App. 3d 237 (1994) Airline cannot be liable for slip and fall on ice on tarmac.
  • Romack v. R. Gingerich Co. 314 Ill. App. 3d 1065 (3d Dist. 2000) Determination of whether partial waiver of workers' compensation lien is good faith settlement under Illinois Contribution Act.
  • Brown v. Crabtree Auto/pedestrian collision case involving catastrophic injuries to plaintiff.  Result was plaintiff's verdict, reduced by 50% for plaintiff's contributory negligence.  Net award was $750,000.  Case was tried on a high/low agreement, this number fell within that range.
  • VanHoose v. Phillip Environmental Structural Work Act case involving whether client provided an unsafe workplace when plaintiff used a man lift to move a steel plate, and whether our client was "in charge of plaintiff's work;" trial lasted 5 days.  The result was plaintiff's verdict - 90% fault of third party defendant, 3% to property owner and 7% to our client, a subcontractor on the premises.
  • Delta Sigma Phi Fraternity v. Sound and Signal Electronics, William Murphy, individually and d/b/a Sound and Signal Electronics, SecurityLink, Inc. and SecurityLink, Inc., f/k/a SecurityLink from Ameritech f/k/a Ameritech Monitoring Services, Inc., and ADT Security Services Inc., and TYCO International (US) Inc. Mediation of large property damage claim involving destruction of fraternity house fire; represented fire alarm monitoring company at mediation and resolved case following lengthy discovery and mediation/settlement discussions for five months. 
  • Proper venue for personal injury action against deputy sheriff is county in which sheriff's office is located, not plaintiff's county of residence.
  • Land v. Montgomery Health Care
  • Estate of Leon Rademacher v. Teledyne Industries, Inc., Teledyne Continental Motor, et al.
  • Melvina Hopkins, as Mother and Next Friend of Charles Lee, a Minor, et al. v. Bergman, et al.
  • Shank v. H.C. Fields 373 Ill. App. 3d 290 (4th Dist. 2007) Finding the acts of a road construction contractor were not the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.
  • Vivian Murphy, Executor of the Estate of Joseph E. Murphy (Deceased) v. Ron Cline Trucking and James Stephens Filed in DeWitt County, Sixth Judicial Circuit of Illinois - A wrongful death case wherein it was alleged that the plaintiff sustained a subdural hematoma from a motor vehicle accident which eventually caused his death.
  • Owen v. C 113 Ill. 2d 273 (1986) Application of innocent construction rule in defamation case.
  • Gibson v. Village of Oquawka 98 L 6 (Henderson County) Filed in Henderson County, Ninth Judicial Circuit of Illinois - A premises liability case wherein plaintiff sustained an injury which resulted in bilateral knee surgeries.
  • Bhattacharya v. Venture Stores, Inc., and Unarco Industries, Inc. 86 L 195 (Macon County) Filed in Macon County, Sixth Judicial Circuit of Illinois - Personal injury case involving an infant who was placed in a shopping cart which tipped over resulting in bilateral femur fractures.
  • Dwayne Hoffer v. American Family Insurance 95 L 345 (Tazewell County) Filed in Tazewell County, Tenth Judicial Circuit of Illinois - A breach of contract and bad faith case against the insurer for alleged improper denial of a theft claim.
  • Veltman v. Employers Mutual Casualty (Jury trial, 1996, Will County) In what is believed to be the first spoliation case tried after the Illinois Supreme Court's opinion of Boyd v. Travelers Insurance, a directed verdict was obtained for Employer's Mutual Casualty in connection with the loss of the quick coupler valve which was allegedly defective, causing an 18 years old employee to be blinded after exposure to anhydrous ammonia. The case was tried in two phases. The first phase focused on the product liability allegations against the maker of the quick coupler valve while the second phase revolved around the loss of the evidence and whether that loss impaired the ability of the parties to adequately present their cases.

Publications

  • "Punitive Damages - Complicity Rule Instruction," Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly (1991)
  • "The Admissibility of Expert Reconstruction Testimony Where There is Also Eyewitness Testimony, Sometimes You See It, Sometimes You Don't," Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly (1996)
  • "Computer Records Foundation," Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly (1993)
  • "Duty of General Contractor to Independent Contractor's Employee on Construction Site," Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly (1999)
  • "Foundation and Admissibility of Videotape Surveillance," Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly (1993)
  • "Open and Obvious Danger Doctrine is Not a Per Se Bar to Finding a Duty on the Part of a Landowner to Protect Against Injuries From Diving Into a Body of Water," Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly (1999)
  • "Premises Liability Update," Heyl Royster (2005)
  • "The Attorney - Client Relationship," Illinois Institute of Continuing Legal Education Civil Practice Handbook (2002)
  • "Code Blue! Ambulance Manufacturing Specifications May Pre-empt State Common Law Claims," Northern Illinois University Law Review (2001)
  • "What Constitutes an Invalid 'Blanket Consent' Within the Purview of Illinois' Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act?" Northern Illinois University Law Review (2002)
  • Co-author, "Rule 41(a) Voluntary Dismissal in Federal Court Takes Effect Immediately Upon Filing, Not When Docketed," Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly (2008)
  • "Developing Basic Trial Skills," The Civil Litigator (2004)
  • Chapter on Privileges in the Illinois Institute of Continuing Legal Education (IICLE) Manual of Illinois Civil Trial Evidence
  • "Without Fear or Fervor," Defense Research Institute Judicial Task Force - Contributing author.  The paper explored the current issues facing modern judiciary and methods of constructively addressing those issues. (2007)
  • Co-Editor, Trial Briefs, the Civil Practice and Procedure Section newsletter published by the Illinois State Bar Association
  • "The Necessity of Analyzing All Amendments for Lack of Timeliness Under the 'Relation Back' Doctrine of ICCP §2-616(b)" (2005)
  • Missouri Wrongful Death Statute, Missouri Law Review (1992)
  • Contract Law Handbook, "Economic Loss - The Line Between Contract and Tort," Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education (2008)
  • "Remedies for Noncompliance" (book chapter), Illinois Civil Discovery Practice, Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education (1979, 1982, Supp. 1984, 1987, Suppl. 1990, 1992, Supp. 1994, 1996, Supp. 1999, 2003, Supp. 2006)
  • "Tort Reform Needed: The Physician-Patient Privilege," Illinois Defense Counsel Newsletter (1988)
  • "Tort Reform Needed: The Laue Rule," Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly Newsletter (1988)
  • "Survey of Illinois Law - Evidence," Southern Illinois Law Journal (co-author 1991)
  • "Survey of Illinois Law - Tort Developments," Southern Illinois Law Journal (co-author 1992, 1994 and 1996)
  • "How the New Civil Rules Will Affect Defense and Corporate Counsel"
  • "Preparing Your Expert Witness to Answer the Hard Questions at Deposition"
  • Defense Counsel Training Manual (Chapter Author)
  • "Winning the Defense Verdict" (Chapter Author)
  • Life After Daubert and Kumho Tire:  An Update on the Admissibility of Expert Testimony, Illinois Bar Journal
  • Illinois Appellate Court First District Vacates $25 Million Jury Verdict Because Trial Court Improperly Barred Expert Testimony Regarding Plaintiff's Blood-Alcohol Level, Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly
  • Illinois Appellate Court Third District Holds that Collateral Source Rule Prohibits Evidence that Medical Bills Were Paid by Medicare, Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly
  • Fourth District Holds That Collateral Source Rule Does Not Apply To Plaintiff's Medical Bills Paid By Medicare or Medicaid, Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly
  • Third District Holds That General Contractor Did Not Exercise Sufficient Control Over Subcontractor's Work to Create Liability Under Section 414 of Restatement (Second) of Torts, Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly 
  • Fifth District Appellate Court Holds That Frye General Acceptance Test Does Not Apply to Nonscientific Expert Testimony, Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly
  • Trial Court Properly Refused Plaintiff's Jury Instruction Seeking Damages for Future Pain and Suffering, Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly
  • Illinois Supreme Court Holds That Collateral Source Rule Does Not Prohibit a Plaintiff from Recovering Entire Amount of Medical Bills Initially Billed Even Though the Medical Providers Ultimately Accepted a Discounted Amount from Plaintiff's Insurer in Full Satisfaction of the Bills, Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly
  • Court Holds that Each Plaintiff in a Multiple-Plaintiff Civil Case is Entitled to One Motion for Substitution of Judge . . . Court Properly Barred Plaintiff's Expert's Testimony Because Backward Extrapolation Methodology is Not Generally Accepted in Scientific Community/Trial Court Should Have Barred Opinion Testimony of Neurosurgeon Due to Defense Counsel's Petrillo Violation, Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly
  • Life After "Same Part of the Body:" An Update on Admissibility of Prior Injuries, Illinois Bar Journal
  • Trial Court Properly Held That Surveillance Videotape of Plaintiff's Activities is Not Privileged from Disclosure as Work Product/Trial Court Properly Allowed Plaintiff to Introduce Day-in-the-Life Video That Was Not Disclosed to Defendants Until Day of Trial/Trial Court Properly Denied Motion for Substitution of Judge as a Matter of Right Where Trial Judge Participated in Informal Discussions at Several Pretrial Conferences and Status Hearings, Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly (2005)
  • Court Properly Denied Motion to Dismiss Product Liability Action Even Though Product Involved in Occurrence Was Destroyed/Court Properly Allowed Architect to Provide Opinion Testimony Regarding Golf Course Safety Despite Architect's Lack of Experience in Golf Course Design and Architecture," Illinois Defense Counsel Quarterly (2004)
  • Co-author, "The Power Behind the Robe: A Primer on Contempt Law," published by Illinois Bar Journal (2009)
  • Co-author, "Return of the Verdict and Entry of Judgment" chapter in Illinois Civil Practice: Trying the Case, published by the Illinois Institute of Continuing Education (2009)
  • "Physician Disciplinary Records:  TMI?!" Illinois Defense Counsel Defense Update, Employment Law, Vol. 11 No. 8 (2010)